The Winter 1999 Updates
To the Elect Hobie
Homepage
*There's
Only One Honorable Way Out of This (Impeachment) Mess!* (Below)
*The 200 Best Zippergate
Quotes
Anywhere!*
Page 1: Lying &
Legalese Page
2: Sex
Page 3: Sorry,
Stupidity,
Character, Hillary, Polls
Page 4: Perjury,
Foreign
Reaction, Credibility, Moral Authority
Page 5: Independent
Counsel, Impeachment, History
*The State of
the Union Address (Hobie
Wanted Clinton To Deliver)*
*The
Real Scandals Update*
*And the Three Most Feared Words In Congress:
"Revolutionary
Election Reform"*
*************************************************
"THERE IS ONLY ONE HONORABLE
WAY OUT OF THIS (Impeachment) MESS!"
"I made a mistake, a critical lapse in
judgment....
well actually I made 2 mistakes and two critical lapses of judgment...
and words alone cannot express how very sorry I am ....that I signed
those
2 bills?"
Bill Clinton's true thoughts as divined by
HobieDog
Mistake #1
"This law, originally passed in 1978, is a
foundation stone for the trust between the government and our
citizens.
It ensures that no matter what party controls the Congress, or the
executive
branch, an independent, non-partisan process will be in place to
guarantee
the integrity of public officials and ensure that no one is above the
law."
Bill Clinton signing the reauthorization
of the Independent Counsel Act, June 30, 1994
&
Mistake #2
"We together are taking a big step toward
bringing the laws of our land back in line
with the values of our people, and beginning
to restore the line between right and wrong."
Bill Clinton signing the Crime Bill of 1994
which changed the rules of evidence so Paula
Jones' attorneys
could ask Clinton about his past affairs.
For almost a year now the
politicians,
political pundits and talking heads have been bewitched, bothered,
befuddled
and bewildered .... and honestly the last 12 months have been so close
to a political X-File that even HobieDog has had trouble understanding
how we got into this mess, and how we can get out of it with any
shred of dignity and honor.... so as the Senate
debates
impeachment or censure let's see if Hobie's heartland spin can breach
the
beltway....
Hobie's family usually
has lively debates on current affairs. But for the last 10 months
the children have resolutely refused to talk about the Clinton-Lewinsky
affair because the details are simply too embarrassing to allow a
decorous
discussion. However the only honorable way out of this mess
became
clear when last Fall the 14 year old son finally said four simple
words:
"he
lied under oath."
It's not that Clinton
lied.
Even 14 year olds know that politicians can be less than truthful and
that
almost everyone lies about sex sometime. But Clinton lied when he
swore to the court and to the American people he wouldn't. And
the Key Point is he didn't have to lie:
he could have admitted he had a sexual affair with Monica Lewinsky and
was sorry; or he could have said it was personal and refused to answer,
taking the 5th Amendment if necessary. Instead he raised his right hand
and swore "to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth,"
and then not only denied he had sex with Monica, but also that he
couldn't
even remember being alone with her.
Clinton lied under oath
in the Paula Jones sexual harassment suit and to the Independent
Counsel's
grand jury. While many from both parties now question the breadth
of the Independent Counsel's powers, attorneys for Paula Jones were
able
to ask Clinton about his other affairs because the Crime Bill of 1994
changed
the rules of evidence to for the first time allow evidence about past
offenses
by a person accused of sexual harassment. A number of legal
scholars
opposed this change because evidence of past offenses is so prejudicial
that a jury might well forget that the question is whether the
individual
committed a particular act, not whether they are a bad person.
However
Clinton strongly supported this provision and eagerly signed the Bill
into
law.
Since neither of these
laws came down from a mountain on tablets, legally
and logically Congress has but two choices.
If Congress believes the Independent Counsel powers are appropriate or
that a jury should be able to know about prior offenses by a person
accused
of sexual harassment, then it has no choice but to make sure Clinton is
punished for misleading and obstructing his testimony. Otherwise
every person accused of sexual harassment or subject to any Independent
Counsel proceeding will use the same tactics and render these laws
meaningless.
If however Congress has second thoughts about powers of the Independent
Counsel and/or the new rule of evidence in sexual harassment cases,
they
can change these laws -- even retroactively.
Since impeachment is a
political process, it is highly unlikely 67 Senators would or
should
vote
to impeach a president unless a majority of the American people
agreed.
And if politically impeachment isn't warranted and Congress is
unwilling
or unable to change the Independent Counsel law and repeal the new rule
of evidence in sexual harassment cases, the only legal and logical, and
moral choice is to censure Clinton -- and, as his own lawyers have
suggested,
have him face prosecution for perjury after he leaves office as every
other
American would in the forum designed to determine such questions:
a court of law.
Indeed a major issue behind
the headlines has been whether to let the
criminal justice system run its normal course
and prosecute Clinton for perjury after he leaves office on January 20,
2001. And this is a major reason the Republicans have insisted
Clinton
admit to lying under oath and why Clinton continues to insist that he
didn't lie under oath because he didn't think he was lying.
The stakes are high -- not just to broker a deal on censure --
but
also because while it is entirely possible Clinton would be found not
guilty,
especially by a jury in the District of Columbia, a guilty verdict
could
result in the loss of his pension and funds for a presidential library,
as well as disbarment from the legal profession. [Update
Note: Fortunately
Judge Wright's holding Clinton in contempt of court for giving
"intentionally
false, misleading and evasive answers" and otherwise "undermining
the integrity of the judicial system" provides an appropriate sanction
without the trauma of a trial after Clinton has left office. See
the Spring 1999 Update!]
Clearly Clinton still
doesn't
get it. He has apologized for making a
mistake and a
critical lapse in judgment when we now know he made at least 80
mistakes
and critical lapses of judgment with Monica alone. And the
mistakes
weren't just repeated sexual contacts with a 21 year old intern, but
numerous
private meetings, 50 telephone calls, and many exchanges of gifts and
confidences.
Perhaps most revealing was his rebuke to a cabinet member who had
the temerity to chastise him that her type of thinking "would have
given
the country Nixon rather than Kennedy." This not only shows a breathtaking
self-denial about how the rules of press coverage have dramatically
changed
over the last 35 years, but also that he
believes seeking sexual favors from subordinates is a prerogative of
his
position, and he expects his staff, friends, and family to accept,
cover,
and enable these activities as they had in the past.
So why then are the
American
people not more outraged?
And why have so
many intelligent people continued to support Clinton, often with
tortured
logic like Gloria Steinum's ludicrous, and unsustainable rationale that
a political leader can drop his pants and grope and make the grossest
sexual
advances to subordinates as long as he takes his hands away and pulls
up
his pants when "she says no." Because the
Republicans don't get it either. They
seem
oblivious that the saturation of public culture with sex has changed
private
morals, and adultery and different kinds of sex do not carry the taboos
of an earlier age. And releasing the X-rated details as widely as
possible rather than as discretely as possible, and at the first
opportunity
rather than as a last resort, clearly showed the Republicans were less
interested in what was best for our country or our institutions than
what
they perceived was best for their political party.
But the main
reason for this mess is the
Republicans seem clueless that their rigid position on guns and
abortion
are so far out of step with most Americans, and thus the American
people
are not so much enamored of Clinton as afraid to turn the country over
to the religious right and the NRA. Simply
put, morality cannot be legislated just as surely as high office
doesn't
automatically confer values or character or integrity.
Clearly many Republicans
are after Clinton because they consider him to be "immoral," and
clearly many believe the Impeachment charges "make up" for misconduct
in
other areas that can't be proven. (FBI files on prominent
Republicans
that are "accidentally" sent to the White House, Rose law firm files
that
"magically materialize" in the residence area of the White House, video
tapes of fundraisers that "magically de-materialize," and 90 witnesses
who have fled the country or taken the 5th show something is
wrong.)
But also clearly, despite the public rhetoric, the process would not
have
gotten this far if moderate Republicans and many Democrats were not
disgusted
with Clinton's actions as well.
Clinton supporters argue
that impeachment is only proper when there are high crimes and
misdemeanors
"against the state." But our founding fathers knew what they
didn't
know, the future, and thus left the standard ambiguous because at
some point a president's private actions could render him incapable of
governing, and impeachment would be the only alternative for a
president
who was unable to separate what was best for the country from what was
best for himself. For example, while
consensual extramarital sex between consenting adults lacks the social
stigma and political penalty it had in the past, at some point sex
still
matters. What if Monica had been 20 instead of 21 years
old?
Or 18, or 16, or 14, or 12? Or had been Mark instead of Monica?
Indeed the real
question is whether Clinton can
effectively
govern over the next 24 months. We are told he has a tremendous
ability
to "compartmentalize," meaning he can keep his private
faults
separate from his public virtues -- or that he can be in denial about
his
private failings while being rational about his public strengths.
But can we be sure his exceptionally poor judgment and breath-taking
stupidity
will be limited to his private life. And how can we be sure his
convincing
and emphatic lies will be limited to his private affairs... particularly
if he doesn't even know when he is lying.
Connecting the dots leads to
three
inescapable conclusions: (1) assuming the
Senate will not impeach, any censure must include a heavy sanction
for lying under oath; (2) if the president loses enough public support
so that he cannot effectively and fully exercise the political and
moral
powers of his office, the elders in his party should insist he resign;
and (3) there is but one logical and
honorable
way out of this mess for the American people: we must insist on
Revolutionary
Election Campaign Reform -- not just outlawing "soft money"
and
foreign money, and other financing reforms, but changing the way
candidates
are chosen and campaigns are conducted.
Think about it: Monica
didn't get her formerly prestigious job as a White House Intern because
of her academic record or work credentials, but because her family knew
a major contributor to the Democratic party. Think
about it: in
the not too distant past accepting campaign funds from the Red Chinese
Army would not have been just a possible campaign financing violation,
but treason.
Think about it:
in the last few weeks the Election
Commission
and a lower federal court have gutted the modest campaign reforms
enacted
in the 1970's by allowing unlimited soft-money contributions from any
individual,
company, or organization, whether American or foreign. Think
about it: we
have been told spending over $500 million on a presidential election is
justified because the process and press can "vet" the candidates and we
will end up with only the brightest and the best. (As Monica
would
say: "Hello!") Just Think about
it:
Congress'
only consistent and effective bipartisan efforts have been to defeat
campaign
election reform.
The ultimate
irony
is that while Clinton gained and retained the presidency by
basing
his every move and gesture on daily polls, he largely destroyed his
presidency
by (1) deciding to lie under oath a second time because a poll
showed his popularity rating would go down if he admitted he lied under
oath the first time; and (2) because he
was
unable to believe the Republicans would ignore
the polls and press for impeachment after
the election.
The bottom
line
is the Republicans would be far wiser to cease their complicity in
demeaning
our institutions and let history bestow its harsh judgment.
Because
surely ten years from now the sex scandals will be but a footnote to to
the ultimate tragedy of the Clinton Presidency: his failure to
use
the office to address the real problems including special interest and
foreign influence on our elections; the bankruptcy of social security
and
Medicare; and a failed foreign policy that allowed countries to develop
nuclear and chemical capabilities for terror and blackmail.
The present distraction over censure and
impeachment
is but another sign that our campaign election system is broken and
needs
to be fixed. This is our generation's most important
challenge...
because while the present problems are daunting, the future
possibilities
are limitless.
There's more:
The Real Scandals
Update
the Amazing 200 Best
Zippergate Quotes
Revolutionary Campaign
Election Reform
or Return to the Elect Hobie Homepage
This page was created in 1998; last updated 8/22/00
Copyright original material and format only, see The
Elect Hobie Homepage