The Winter 1999-2000 Update
to the Elect Hobie Homepage

Campaign Finance Reform

The most vociferous and intractable opponent of campaign financing reform has been Senator McConnell of Kentucky who's opposition has been based on the premise that campaign contributions are protected under the 1st Amendment guarantee of free speech... i.e. this constitutionally protected right cannot be infringed in any way... contributions in unlimited amounts from any source, domestic or foreign, identified or secret, are not only proper, but to be encouraged.  The recent U.S. Supreme Court case of Nixon v Shrink Missouri Government PAC totally rebuked this premise.  Simply put, the Supreme Court Justices obviously were alarmed at how campaigns are financed and had no problem saying limits are entirely acceptable.

"...this case does not present a close call.... Leave the perception of impropriety unanswered and the cynical assumption that large donors call the tune could jeopardize the willingness of the voters to take part in democratic governance. Democracy works only if the people have faith in those who govern, and that faith is bound to be shattered when high officials and their appointees engage in activities which arouse suspicions of malfeasance and corruption....  there is little reason to doubt that sometimes large contributions will work actual corruption of our political system, and no reason to question the existence of a corresponding suspicion among voters...." Justice Souter, Majority opinion
"Money is property, it is not free speech."  Supreme Court Justice Stevens' concurring opinion

And even Justice Kennedy, one of the strongest 1st Amendment proponents stunned observers by allowing that limits might be acceptable:

"I would leave open the possibility that Congress, or a state legislature, might devise a system in which there are some limits on expenditures and contributions, thus permitting officeholders a to concentrate their time and efforts on official duties rather than on fundraising."  Justice Kennedy, dissenting opinion

The KEY POINT is politicians do not oppose campaign reform because they like raising money, but simply because the present system best protects their incumbency and the status quo.

98% of House Incumbents won re-election in 1998 and 90% of Senate incumbents won reelection
"The compelling factor in my decision was the searing reality that I would have to spend half of every day between now and the next election fundraising."  Sen. Frank Lauteng announcing his retirement in February.

51% of voting age Americans did not vote in 1996, 64% did not vote in 1998; more than half of all children in America live in homes where neither parent votes.
While only about 20% of Americans between 18 and 24 voted in the past 2 elections, nearly 46% of that same age bracket volunteered for groups like Habitat for Humanity in 1998, up from 38% in 1995.
"The fact that so few civic-minded Americans vote is damming -- not of the no-show voters but of the so-called 'serious' politicians whose homogenized, flattering platitudes fail to engage them.  At a time when most Americans, not merely the young, take a pass on election day, there may well be an untapped hunger for a candidate of any stripe, with or without a boa, who instead of pandering to America will kick it in the pants.  F. Rich, 10/23/99
"'I don't know of anyone who sets out thinking ,'Let's set out to kill democracy.'  [But] they want their candidate to win.  If democracy gets hurt in the process....'" K. Lauerman, quoting a political campaign consultant working in New Hampshire in an article on "one of the dirty little secrets of political consultants" of using negative ads to sully the process so completely that mainstream voters are turned off and don't vote at all.  "Blocking the Vote," NYT Magazine 1/23/00
The low voter participation is a key reason the NRA and other single-issue groups are able to impose their views on the country.... e.g. their biggest asset isn't their financial contributions, but their ability to arouse their members to political action... it's not that the NRA (and other single-issue groups) members are more civic-minded, but rather that they have been whipped into action by highly emotional and strident appeals...
This "strategy" of using negative campaigns to intentionally to turn off voters so each of their "true believers" votes will count for more.... is nothing less than an attack on the fundamental principals of our democracy.....

"No one has ever seen money like this."  C. Lewis, Center for Public Integrity
At least 30 senators and representatives have recently created "leadership" PAC's, many based in states that do not require lawmakers to identify their donors or limit the amount of contributions they can accept....
Anther fundraising loophole is "527 organizations," which test the boundaries of campaign law by allowing unlimited contributions from unidentified donors...and all tax-free.  Besides the Republican and Democrat parties, this new gimmick is being used by the Christian Coalition and the Sierra Club.
"Secret unlimited money is about as dangerous as you can get on American politics in terms of corrupting the system. "  F. Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21.  NYT 10/20/99
"The average American understands that politics these days is more of a spectator sport than a participatory sport."  L Makison, Center for Responsive Politics
Money is a tool of the politicians trade just as hammers are to carpenters and hoes are to gardeners.  D. Rosenbaum NYT 9/15/999
"The true spirit of democracy cannot survive where cash is king."  B. Herbert NYT 10/7/99
"If we want to make significant changes with regard to how we conduct campaigns, we must look beyond limiting the flow of money into politics and rather look to limiting the candidates need for money to pay for television time."  M. Frankel
The original McCain-Feingold campaign reform bill included provisions for free or reduced-cost TV time for federal candidates.  But the sponsors abandoned that provision rather than take on the influential broadcast lobby.
Former Presidents Ford and Carter and former CBS News anchorman Walter Cronkite and a host of other civic leaders lobbied television executives to give candidates short segments of free time just before the election.  Television broadcasters licenses are worth billions of dollars, and were given to them by the federal government for free.
More than 25% of state constitutions declare that "a system of public instruction is required because an informed and capable citizenry is vital to the preservation of a free and democratic government.
Only 9% of high school seniors were able give 2 reasons why it is important for citizens to be involved in a democratic society.  Results of a national test on American Government given in 1999
"When students in the world's most powerful democracy cannot see the value of representative government, we need to rethink the culture we have created.  St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial
From 1997 to 1999 the number of registered lobbyists in Washington grew by a whopping 37%, to more than 20,000, while the amount of money spent reached $1.42 billion.... this works out to roughly 38 lobbyists for each member of Congress.... There are 20,000 lobbyists hard at work every day.  Like a swarm of ravenous termites reducing a house to sawdust, they are making a meal out of the foundations of our democracy.  It's time to throw a tent over Washington and fumigate."  A. Huffington 8/22/99
"I think the only difference between me and the other candidates is that I'm more honest and my women are more beautiful... I've already go my own airplane.  We could save money on Air Force One."  D. Trump
"Let's move tax day from April 15 to the day before the elections.  We may then see how strong this supposed liberal revival really is."  W. Pope NYT Letters 11/17/99
"Any veteran observer of Congress would say that the typical member today is better educated and harder-working than whoever held the seat 35 years ago, and less likely to be a drunk or a womanizer or to take bribes.  Yet consumers of a press that rarely covered those weaknesses before and covers them now as a regular matters have an opposite set of impressions.  And 30 second' attack ads that vilify all the candidates invite people not to vote for particular candidates and not to vote at all." C. Gans,
"Nowadays, soft money can't be used to promote a candidate... it is used to destroy a candidate.  The soft money is the origin of negative advertising that afflicts our political system."  Jimmy Carter
"Voters should banish the spin doctors who find conviction in focus groups and who confuse salesmanship with leadership.  Politics is a clash of ideas, not a blood sport.  It is a contest for principles, not a holy war.  Only those willing to lose for principles deserve to win at the polls."  Gerald Ford, 4/17/97

The Shakedown of Corporate America

"For a growing number of executives, there is no question that the unrelenting pressure for 5 and 6 figure political contributions amounts to influence peddling and a corrupting influence.  What has been called legalized bribery looks like extortion to us.... Congress passed laws that would put corporate executives in jail for offering money to a foreign official in the course of business.... I know from personal experience and from other executives that it's not easy to say no to appeals for cash from powerful members of Congress....  The threat may be veiled but the message is clear:  failing to donate could hurt your company.  Increasingly fund-raisers also make sure you know that your competitors have contributed, implying that you should pay a toll in Washington to stay competitive."  E. Kangas, Chairman, Deloitte Touche NYT 10/22/99
"We have had a growing concern about the current system of financing and conducting political campaigns.  The impact of unregulated soft money and the prevalence of highly expensive, often negative advertising are increasingly distorting the electoral process."  Time-Warner Chairman Gerald Levin announcing a ban on soft money contributions, joining other companies like Allied Signal, GM, Lockheed-Martin, and Monsanto Co. .. other companies that don't have an official ban but have not given soft money include IBM, Wal-Mart, & Mobil.  K. Doyle, BNA 11/29/99

Next:
Guns
Back to Winter 2000 Update

Original material only copyright 2000; other material copyright by holders;
see the Elect Hobie Homepage; Distribution encouraged with attribution.